УКР ENG

Search:


Email:  
Password:  

 REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE

KV #19905-9705 PR dated 02.04.2013.

 FOUNDERS

RESEARCH CENTRE FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROBLEMS of NAS (KHARKIV, UKRAINE)

According to the decision No. 802 of the National Council of Television and Radio Broadcasting of Ukraine dated 14.03.2024, is registered as a subject in the field of print media.
ID R30-03156

 PUBLISHER

Liburkina L. M.

 SITE SECTIONS

Main page

Editorial staff

Editorial policy

Annotated catalogue (2011)

Annotated catalogue (2012)

Annotated catalogue (2013)

Annotated catalogue (2014)

Annotated catalogue (2015)

Annotated catalogue (2016)

Annotated catalogue (2017)

Annotated catalogue (2018)

Annotated catalogue (2019)

Annotated catalogue (2020)

Annotated catalogue (2021)

Annotated catalogue (2022)

Annotated catalogue (2023)

Annotated catalogue (2024)

Thematic sections of the journal

Proceedings of scientific conferences


Dissemination of Conspiracy Theories as an Institutional Factor in the Dynamics of Formal Rules
Volosnikova N. M., Ugrimova I. V., Gybanova N. N.

Volosnikova, Nataliia M., Ugrimova, Iryna V., and Gybanova, Nino N. (2020) “Dissemination of Conspiracy Theories as an Institutional Factor in the Dynamics of Formal Rules.” Business Inform 12:25–31.
https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2020-12-25-31

Section: Economic Theory

Article is written in Ukrainian
Downloads/views: 0

Download article (pdf) -

UDC 330.1

Abstract:
The article is aimed at determining the consequences of manipulation with conspiracy theories for the dynamics of the current formal rules and measures to prevent such manipulation. It is identified that four groups of factors can be allocated to determine the suitability of conspiracy theories common in society for exploitation by manipulator players in their own interests, namely: number of group members that believe in the appropriate conspiracy theory; dependence of the degree of concern of supporters of conspiracy theories on the norms of the current legislation; non-contradiction of the institutional changes, desired for supporters of conspiracy theories, to the interests of influential interested groups; opportunity to accuse a political opponent of participating in a conspiracy. It is specified that the only group of manipulator players, which always has the opportunity to take advantage of common conspiracy theories in society, are the opportunist players. It is concluded that the most effective of the mentioned in the article are the measures to increase the education of society. Due to the improvement of the quality of the overall component of education and the formation of a broad outlook of members of society, critical attitude to dubious assertions and baseless accusations of opponents produced by numerous opportunist players is formed, and thus less favorable conditions for the spread of conspiracy theories are created. However, these measures are also characterized by a significant disadvantage, which significantly limits the prospects for their application – a high level of costs associated with the implementation, and the reluctance of employers to pay for «unnecessary» education of employees.

Keywords: conspiracy theory, institutional factor, formal rules.

Bibl.: 23.

Volosnikova Nataliia M. – Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor, Associate Professor, Department of General Economic Theory, National Technical University «Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute» (2 Kyrpychova Str., Kharkіv, 61002, Ukraine)
Email: [email protected]
Ugrimova Iryna V. – Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor, Associate Professor, Department of Management and Taxation, National Technical University «Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute» (2 Kyrpychova Str., Kharkіv, 61002, Ukraine)
Email: [email protected]
Gybanova Nino N. – Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor, Associate Professor, Department of General Economic Theory, National Technical University «Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute» (2 Kyrpychova Str., Kharkіv, 61002, Ukraine)
Email: [email protected]

List of references in article

Lewandowsky, S. et al. “Memory for Fact, Fiction, and Misinformation: The Iraq War 2003“. Psychological Science, vol. 16, no. 3 (2005): 190-195. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00802.x
Lewandowsky, S. et al. “Misinformation and Its Correction: Continued Influence and Successful Debiasing“. Psychological science in the Public Interest, vol. 13, no. 3 (2012): 106-131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612451018
Lewandowsky, S., and Oberauer, K. “NASA Faked the Moon Landing - Therefore, (Climate) Science Is a Hoax: An Anatomy of the Motivated Rejection of Science“. Psychological Science, vol. 24, no. 5 (2013): 622-633. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797612457686
Swami, V. et al. “Lunar Lies: The Impact of Informational Framing and Individual Differences in Shaping Conspiracist Beliefs about the Moon Landings“. Applied Cognitive Psychology, vol. 27, no. 1 (2013): 71-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2873
Swami, V., and Coles, R. “The Truth is Out There: Belief in Conspiracy Theories“. The Psychologist, vol. 23, no. 7 (2010): 560-563.
Swami, V., Chamorro-Premuzic, T., and Furnham, A. “Unanswered Questions: A Preliminary Investigation of Personality and Individual Difference Predictors of 9/11 Conspiracist Beliefs“. Applied Cognitive Psychology, vol. 24, no. 6 (2010): 749-761. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1583
Uscinski, J. E., Klofstad, C., and Atkinson, M. D. “What Drives Conspiratorial Beliefs? The Role of Informational Cues and Predispositions“. Political Research Quarterly, vol. 69, no. 1 (2016): 57-71.
Uscinski, J. E. “When Does the Public's Issue Agenda Affect the Media's Issue Agenda (and Vice-Versa)? Developing a Framework for Media-Public Influence“. Social Science Quarterly, vol. 90, no. 4 (2009): 796-815. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00663.x
Douglas, K. M., and Sutton, R. M. “The hidden impact of conspiracy theories: Perceived and actual influence of theories surrounding the death of Princess Diana“. The Journal of Social Psychology, vol. 148, no. 2 (2008): 210-222. DOI: 10.3200/SOCP.148.2.210-222
Douglas, K. M., Sutton, R. M., and Cichocka, A. “The Psychology of Conspiracy Theories“. Current Directions in Psychological Science, vol. 26, no. 6 (2017): 538-542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417718261
Ballova Mikuskova, E. “Conspiracy Beliefs of Future Teachers“. Current Psychology, vol. 37, no. 3 (2018): 692-701. DOI: 10.1007/s12144-017-9561-4
Grzesiak-Feldman, M. “The Effect of High-Anxiety Situations on Conspiracy Thinking“. Current Psychology, vol. 32, no. 1 (2013): 100-118. DOI: 10.1007/s12144-013-9165-6
Jarrett, G. “Conspiracy Theories of Consciousness“. Philosophical Studies, vol. 96, no. 1 (1999): 45-58.
Grebe, E., and Nattrass, N. “AIDS Conspiracy Beliefs and Unsafe Sex in Cape Town“. AIDS and Behavior, vol. 16, no. 3 (2012): 761-773. DOI: 10.1007/s10461-011-9958-2
Abramov, F. V. “Manipuliuvannia suspilnymy nastroiamy yak chynnyk neefektyvnosti neformalnykh pravyl“ [Manipulating the Public Moods as a Factor in the Inefficiency of Informal Rules]. Biznes Inform. 2018. https://www.business-inform.net/export_pdf/business-inform-2018-11_0-pages-8_13.pdf
Abramov, F. V. “Suspilni nastroi yak faktor dynamiky antykoruptsiinykh formalnykh pravyl“ [The Public Sentiments as a Factor in the Dynamics of Anti-Corruption Formal Rules]. Biznes Inform. 2018. https://www.business-inform.net/export_pdf/business-inform-2018-12_0-pages-26_31.pdf
Abramov, F. V. “Neosvichenist suspilstva yak faktor poshyrennia manipuliuvannia suspilnymy nastroiamy“ [The Society's Lack of Education as a Factor in the Spread of Manipulation with Public Sentiment]. Biznes Inform, no. 6 (2019): 8-12. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2019-6-8-13
Abramov, F. V. “Obshchestvennoye mneniye kak neformalnyy institutsionalnyy faktor neeffektivnosti formalnykh pravil“ [Public Opinion as an Informal Institutional Factor in the Ineffectiveness of Formal Rules]. Visnyk Natsionalnoho tekhnichnoho universytetu «KhPI». Seriia «Tekhnichnyi prohres i efektyvnist vyrobnytstva». 2012. http://repository.kpi.kharkov.ua/bitstream/KhPI-Press/10522/1/vestnik_HPI_2012_14_2_Abramov_Obshchestvennoe.pdf
Abramov, F. V. “Kriterii effektivnosti formalnykh pravil i ikh vliyaniye na ekonomicheskoye razvitiye“ [Criteria of Efficiency of Formal Rules]. Visnyk Odeskoho natsionalnoho universytetu im. I. I. Mechnikova. 2011. http://visnyk-onu.od.ua/journal/2011_16/01.pdf
Abramov, F. V. “Zakhody z poperedzhennia manipuliuvannia suspilnymy nastroiamy“ [Measures to Prevent Manipulation with Public Sentiments]. Biznes Inform, no. 11 (2019): 22-27. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2019-11-22-27
Abramov, F. V. “Indukovanyi opir suspilstva ta zakhody yoho poperedzhennia“ [The Induced Resistance of Society and Measures to Prevent It]. Biznes Inform, no. 5 (2020): 22-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2020-5-22-28
Abramov, F. V. “Chynnyky stalosti umovno neefektyvnykh formalnykh pravyl“ [Factors of Constancy of Conditionally Ineffective Formal Rules]. Visnyk Natsionalnoho tekhnichnoho universytetu «KhPI». Seriia «Tekhnichnyi prohres ta efektyvnist vyrobnytstva». 2015. http://repository.kpi.kharkov.ua/bitstream/KhPI-Press/16479/1/vestnik_HPI_2015_26_Abramov_Chynnyky_stalosti.pdf
Abramov, F. V. “Faktory ustoychivosti formalnykh pravil“ [Stability Factors of Formal Rules]. Visnyk Natsionalnoho tekhnichnoho universytetu «KhPI». Seriia «Tekhnichnyi prohres i efektyvnist vyrobnytstva». 2012. http://repository.kpi.kharkov.ua/bitstream/KhPI-Press/10544/1/vestnik_HPI_2012_25_2_Abramov_Faktory.pdf

 FOR AUTHORS

License Contract

Conditions of Publication

Article Requirements

Regulations on Peer-Reviewing

Publication Contract

Current Issue

Frequently asked questions

 INFORMATION

The Plan of Scientific Conferences


 OUR PARTNERS


Journal «The Problems of Economy»

  © Business Inform, 1992 - 2024 The site and its metadata are licensed under CC BY-SA. Write to webmaster