BUSINESS INFORM JOURNAL.

УКР

ENG

Search:

REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE

KV #19905-9705 PR dated 02.04.2013.

FOUNDERS

RESEARCH CENTRE FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROBLEMS of NAS (KHARKIV, UKRAINE)

According to the decision No. 802 of the National Council of Television and Radio Broadcasting of Ukraine dated 14.03.2024, is registered as a subject in the field of print media.
ID R30-03156

PUBLISHER

Liburkina L. M.

SITE SECTIONS

Etymology of Intellectual Assets: Domestic and Foreign Experience
Stasovska G. M.

Stasovska, Galyna M. (2024) “Etymology of Intellectual Assets: Domestic and Foreign Experience.” Business Inform 3:6–14.
https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2024-3-6-14

Section: Economic Theory

Article is written in Ukrainian
Downloads/views: 0

Download article (pdf) -

UDC 005.338.1:347.7

Abstract:
At the present stage of development of global economic processes, intellectual assets play a special role as the main tool for monetizing the assets of enterprises in business and developing the economy in the country. In the context of the so-called new economy, cybernetic period, information age, every business owns intellectual assets, regardless of whether they have become separate into the economic and legal planes or not. Until recently, firms were rather sluggish in valuing these assets, often defining them as hidden business assets. Now, intellectual assets for business are quickly becoming the defining tools that allow you to distinguish your services and products from similar services and products of competitors. The challenge facing firms today is to develop an individual internal review plan for each service or product offered by the company, and integrating a new or an improved strategy for identifying intellectual assets into the overall business plan. In view of the above, in modern scientific thought, the need for a generalized definition of the concept of «intellectual asset», its classification and measurement methods, as well as the development of a taxonomy of this definition, is especially relevant. It is in this direction that conceptual, methodological, and practical difficulties arise. Thus, the aim of the article is to analyze the existing approaches to the concept of «intellectual asset» and generalize the essence of such approaches. In accordance with the set goal, a study of the theoretical foundations of the scientific category of «intellectual asset» has been carried out and based upon the findings, a generalized classification of intellectual assets has been presented. Based on the analysis of the results of both domestic and foreign studies, the importance of intellectual assets in creating competitive advantages for enterprises and their successful development is substantiated. In the process of conducting a scientific study, conceptual approaches to determining the essence of the concept of «intellectual asset» are analyzed, its classification is defined. It is found that each author gives his own understanding of the essence of this economic category. However, a review of sources does not provide an exhaustive understanding of the place of the term «intellectual asset» within the system of widely used terms: «intangible assets», «intellectual property», «nonmaterial assets». It is determined that all intellectual assets have a nonmaterial form, which is unique in nature and allows to provide economic benefits. A generalized classification of intellectual assets has been provided. It is determined that intellectual assets are an important element of the modern economy and play an important role in the competitiveness of enterprises and contribute to their successful development. Intellectual assets make it possible to increase the level of capitalization, and in the absence of sufficient financial resources and collateral, to provide the investor with additional guarantees of return on capital. That is, intellectual assets are a kind of reserves for future income. The main conclusions that can be drawn on the basis of this analysis are as follows: intellectual assets are nonmaterial assets that have value and can be identified; they are the basis of competitive advantages of enterprises and contribute to their successful development; intellectual assets can be classified according to various criteria, including the scope of use, the degree of clarity of definition and the degree of protection; for effective management of intellectual assets, it is necessary to develop a generalized definition of the concept of «intellectual asset», its classification and measurement methods, as well as to develop a taxonomy of this definition, since it is in this direction that conceptual, methodological, and practical difficulties arise. To improve the efficiency of intellectual assets management, enterprises need to: realize the importance of intellectual assets for their business; develop an intellectual asset management system that will include such elements; identification and valuation of intellectual assets; formation of a strategy for managing intellectual assets; development and implementation of measures to improve the efficiency of the use of intellectual assets; creation of a culture of intellectual asset management that will support its effective implementation.

Keywords: capital, asset, intellectual assets, intangible assets, intellectual capital, enterprise, business.

Tabl.: 1. Bibl.: 30.

Stasovska Galyna M. – Postgraduate Student, Department of Business Economics and Entrepreneurship, Kyiv National Economic University named after Vadym Hetman (54/1 Beresteiskyi Ave., Kyiv, 03057, Ukraine)
Email: [email protected]

List of references in article

Beale, A. Understanding Intellectual Assets (IAs). Swansea University, 2010.
Chartrand, S. “Patents: How Do You Puta Price on Intellectual Property?“ The New York Times. December 18, 2000.
Rodgers, E., and Ratliff, A. “Increasing Shareholder Value in the New Economy: How to Launch a Successful IP Management Strategy“. Association of Corporate Counsel. December 01, 2000. https://www.acc.com/resource-library/increasing-shareholder-value-new-economy-how-launch-successful-ip-management
Roundtable, Boost Your Client's Intellectual Capital IQ. Corp. Legal Times, 2000.
Husakovska, T. O., Sviatnyi, L. O., and Sereda, O. O. “Sutnist i struktura intelektualnoho kapitalu orhanizatsii“ [The Essence and Structure of the Intellectual Capital of an Organization]. Biznes Inform, no. 9 (2023): 269-275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2023-9-269-275
Starkova, N. O., and Kostetskiy, A. N. “Intellektualnyye aktivy firmy: identifikatsiya i upravleniye“ [Firm's Intellectual Assets: Identification and Management]. Ekonomika. Upravleniye. Pravo, no. 4 (2000): 16-22.
Khomych, S. V. “Problema vymiru ta obliku intelektualnoho kapitalu“ [The Problem of Measurement and Accounting of Intellectual Capital]. Visnyk Khmelnytskoho natsionalnoho universytetu Seriia «Ekonomichni nauky». 2011. http://journals.khnu.km.ua/vestnik/pdf/ekon/2011_5_1/110-115.pdf
Sullivan, P. H. Value-Driven Intellectual Capital. How to Convert Intangible Corporate Assets into Market Value. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2000.
Stupniker, H. L. “Zastosuvannia upravlinskoho pidkhodu do formuvannia i otsinky intelektualnoho aktyvu pidpryiemstva“ [The Application of a Managerial Approach to the Formation and Assessment of the Enterprise's Intellectual Asset]. Nauka v informatsiinomu prostori, vol. 6. Dnipropetrovsk, 2009. 111-112.
Bazylevych, V. D., and Ilin, V. V. Intelektualna vlasnist: kreatyvy metafizychnoho poshuku [Intellectual Property: Creatives of Metaphysical Search]. Kyiv: Znannia-Pres, 2008.
Lukicheva, L. I., and Yegorychev, D. N. Vnutrifirmennoye upravleniye intellektualnymi aktivami [In-house Management of Intellectual Assets]. Moscow: Omega-L, 2004.
Tararuiev, Yu. O., and Momot, T. V. “Novyi pohliad na kontseptsiiu nematerialnykh aktyviv“ [A New Look at the Concept of Intangible Assets]. Ekonomika: problemy teorii ta praktyky, vol. III, no. 192 (2004): 851-856.
Butnik-Siverskyi, O. B. “Evrystyka v intelektualnii ekonomitsi abo formuvannia innovatsiinoho pidpryiemnytstva“ [Heuristics in the Intellectual Economy or the Formation of Innovative Entrepreneurship]. Intelektualna vlasnist, no. 9 (2005): 27-32.
Liashenko, N. Ye. “Problemy otsinky intelektualnykh aktyviv v upravlinni“ [Problems of Estimation Intellectual Assets in Management]. Upravlinnia proektamy ta rozvytok vyrobnytstva. 2009. http://www.pmdp.org.ua/images/Journal/31/09lneiau.pdf
Nyzhnyk, N. R., and Mosov, S. P. “Realizatsiia intelektualnykh aktyviv - kliuchovyi moment derzhavnoi polityky Ukrainy v XXI stolitti“ [Realization of Intellectual Assets Is a Key Moment of the State Policy of Ukraine in the 21st Century]. Universytetski naukovi zapysky. 2006. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Unzap_2006_3-4_55
Lehenchuk, S. F. “Bukhhalterske vidobrazhennia intelektualnoho kapitalu“ [Accounting Display of Intellectual Capital]: avtoref. dys. … kand. ekon. nauk : 08.06.04, 2006.
Lukicheva, L. I., and Kurbat, V. Yu. “Organizatsionno-ekonomicheskoye obespecheniye protsessa kommertsializatsii intellektualnykh aktivov“ [Organizational and Economic Support for the Process of Commercialization of Intellectual Assets]. Vestnik IrGTU, no. 2 (2010): 71-75.
Babii, P. S. “Otsinka ta upravlinnia vartistiu intelektualnykh aktyviv subiekta hospodariuvannia“ [Evaluation and Management of the Value of Intellectual Assets of the Business Entity]. Stalyi rozvytok ekonomiky. 2013. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/sre_2013_3_69
Tararuiev, Yu. O. “Udoskonalennia mekhanizmu otsinky intelektualnykh aktyviv budivelnykh pidpryiemstv“ [Improvement of the Mechanism of Assessment of Intellectual Assets of Construction Enterprises]: avtoref. dys. … kand. ekon. nauk : 08.00.04, 2008.
Borisov, A. B. Bolshoy ekonomicheskiy slovar [Large Economic Dictionary]. Moscow: Knizhnyy mir, 2006.
[Legal Act of Ukraine] (2013). https://zakon2.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0336-13#Text
Blank, I. A. Upravleniye aktivami [Asset Management]. Kyiv: Nika-Tsentr, 2000.
[Legal Act of Ukraine] (1999). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0750-99#Text
[Legal Act of Ukraine] (1999). https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/z0499-99#Text
Ibrahimov, E. E. “Modeliuvannia vplyvu intelektualnykh aktyviv na efektyvnist korporatyvnoho upravlinnia z oriientatsiieiu na znannia“ [Modeling the Influence of Intellectual Assets on the Effectiveness of Corporate Management with a Focus on Knowledge]. Formuvannia rynkovykh vidnosyn v Ukraini. 2012. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/frvu_2012_5%281%29__28
Karpenko, A. V. “Derzhavna stratehiia efektyvnoho vykorystannia ekonomichnykh resursiv v umovakh svitovoi hlobalizatsii“ [State Strategy of Effective Use of Economic Resources in the Conditions of World Globalization]. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu vodnoho hospodarstva ta pryrodokorystuvannia. Seriia «Ekonomichni nauky», no. 3 (2014): 126-135.
Karpenko, A. V. “Intelektualni aktyvy: etymolohiia poniattia ta mistse v natsionalnii innovatsiinii systemi“ [Intellectual Assets: Concept Ethimology and Role in the National Innovative System]. Ekonomika i orhanizatsiia upravlinnia, no. 4 (2017): 65-80.
Bradley, K. “Intellectual Capital and the New Wealth of Nations“. Business Strategy Review, vol. 8, no. 1 (1998): 53-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8616.00007
Sullivan, P. H. Profiting from Intellectual Capital: Extracting Value from Innovation. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2001.
Caddy, I. “Intellectual Capital: Recognizing Both Assets and Liabilities“. Journal of Intellectual Capital, vol. 1, no. 2 (2000): 129-146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14691930010377469

FOR AUTHORS

License Contract

Conditions of Publication

Article Requirements

Regulations on Peer-Reviewing

Publication Contract

Current Issue

Frequently asked questions

INFORMATION

The Plan of Scientific Conferences

OUR PARTNERS

Journal «The Problems of Economy»

The site and its metadata are licensed under CC BY-SA.

Write to webmaster