BUSINESS INFORM JOURNAL.

УКР

ENG

Search:

REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE

KV #19905-9705 PR dated 02.04.2013.

FOUNDERS

RESEARCH CENTRE FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROBLEMS of NAS (KHARKIV, UKRAINE)

According to the decision No. 802 of the National Council of Television and Radio Broadcasting of Ukraine dated 14.03.2024, is registered as a subject in the field of print media.
ID R30-03156

PUBLISHER

Liburkina L. M.

SITE SECTIONS

Development and Managerial Decision-Making in an Architectural and Construction Company Based on the «Six Thinking Hats» Method
Makatora D. A., Kubanov R. A., Kopchuk I. M.

Makatora, Dmytro A., Kubanov, Ruslan A., and Kopchuk, Ivan M. (2025) “Development and Managerial Decision-Making in an Architectural and Construction Company Based on the «Six Thinking Hats» Method.” Business Inform 3:391–404.
https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2025-3-391-404

Section: Management and Marketing

Article is written in English
Downloads/views: 0

Download article (pdf) -

UDC 33.339:338.5:339.13.01:351.86

Abstract:
The article explores the implementation of Edward de Bono’s “Six Thinking Hats” method in the managerial practice of architectural and construction companies, which enables a significant improvement in the decision-making process. The authors analyse the relevance of this approach in the context of the modern architectural and construction industry, which faces numerous challenges such as legislative changes, fluctuations in material prices, intense competition, and technological innovations. The “Six Thinking Hats” method provides a multifaceted approach to situation analysis, allowing managers to consider problems from different perspectives: facts, emotions, logic, creativity, and process-oriented thinking. This promotes the adoption of more balanced and effective decisions that take into account various aspects of projects, including financial, environmental, and social dimensions. The article details the role of each “hat”: the white hat focuses on collecting objective data; the yellow highlights potential benefits; the black identifies risks and drawbacks; the red addresses emotions and intuition; the green stimulates creativity; and the blue organizes the thinking process. Such a structured approach helps prevent conflicts and fosters constructive team discussions. The authors emphasize that the application of the “Six Thinking Hats” method enhances employee motivation, as each team member feels that their opinion matters. In turn, this fosters team spirit and innovation, as participants have more opportunities to express their ideas and suggestions. The article also presents practical recommendations for implementing the method in architectural and construction companies. These include conducting training sessions for staff, forming working groups, applying the method regularly in decision-making processes, and evaluating its effectiveness. Particular attention is given to creating a favourable organizational culture that supports the active participation of all team members in the management process. Overall, the authors conclude that Edward de Bono’s “Six Thinking Hats” method has considerable potential to enhance the effectiveness of management activities in architectural and construction companies. Its systemic approach, focused on addressing diverse aspects and stimulating creative thinking, can become a key success factor in today’s dynamic market environment. Implementing this method can contribute to increasing a company’s competitiveness, promoting innovation, and strengthening its position both nationally and internationally.

Keywords: “Six Thinking Hats” method, managerial decision-making, architectural and construction company, innovation, teamwork, management effectiveness, creativity.

Bibl.: 20.

Makatora Dmytro A. – Candidate of Sciences (Engineering), Associate Professor, Department of Machines and Units for Printing Production of the Educational and Scientific Publishing and Printing Institute, National Technical University of Ukraine «Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute» (37 Beresteiskyi Ave., Kyiv, 03056, Ukraine)
Email: [email protected]
Kubanov Ruslan A. – Candidate of Sciences (Pedagogy), Associate Professor, Associate Professor, Department of Development and Spatial Planning, Separate structural subdivision «Institute of Innovative Education of the Kyiv National University of Civil Engineering and Architecture» (4 Osvity Str., Kyiv, 03037, Ukraine)
Email: [email protected]
Kopchuk Ivan M. – Master, Department of Innovative Architecture and Design, Separate structural subdivision «Institute of Innovative Education of the Kyiv National University of Civil Engineering and Architecture» (4 Osvity Str., Kyiv, 03037, Ukraine)
Email: [email protected]

List of references in article

Artemov, V. Yu., & Synhaivska, I. V. (2022). Osoblyvosti protsesiv pryiniattia rishen v umovakh nevyznachenosti. Vcheni zapysky Universytetu «KROK», (1), 149–163. https://doi.org/10.31732/2663-2209-2022-65-149-163
De Bono, E. (1985). Six Thinking Hats. Little, Brown and Company.
Grishchenko, O. F. (2011). Innovatsiine rishennia – kliuchovyi faktor zabezpechennia staloho rozvytku suchasnoho pidpryiemstva. Marketynh i menedzhment innovatsii, (1), 120–127. https://mmi.sumdu.edu.ua/wp-content/uploads/mmi/volume-2-issue-1/mmi2011_1_120_127.pdf
Kravchenko, M. O., & Holiuk, V. Ya. (2022). Pryiniattia upravlinskykh rishen: sutnist ta suchasni tendentsii rozvytku. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo, (40). https://doi.org/10.32782/2524-0072/2022-40-37
Kubanov, R. A., Makatora, D. A., & Yashchenko, O. F. (2024). Motivational mechanism of an architectural and construction manager’s activity. Biznes Inform, (8), 399–412. https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2024-8-399-412
Kvita, H. M., Shikovets, K. O., & Holovach, M. S. (2018). Zastosuvannia metodu Edvarda de Bono v biznes-analizi suchasnoho pidpryiemstva. Skhidna Yevropa: ekonomika, biznes ta upravlinnia, (4), 186–190. https://www.easterneurope-ebm.in.ua/journal/15_2018/32.pdf
Lahola, I. M., & Kharchuk, Ya. Ya. (2024). Shist kapeliukhiv – innovatsiina tekhnolohiia rozvytku «povnokolorovoho myslennia» molodshykh shkoliariv (na prykladi dytyachykh tvoriv M. Vinhranovskoho). Molodyi vchenyi, 1.1, 43–46. https://doi.org/10.32839/2304-5809/2024-1.1-125.1-11
Likholat, O. (2017). Vykorystannia pryiomiv orhanizatsii myslennia Edvarda de Bono v profesiinii osviti. Profesionalizm pedahoha: teoretychni y metodychni aspekty, 5(2), 134–144. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/prptma_2017_5%282%29__16
Litovchenko, B. V. (2017). Humanizatsiia menedzhmentu u hlobalnomu seredovyshchi: Monohrafiia. Dnipro: LIRA.
Marutian, R. R. (2020). Intelektualno-resursne zabezpechennia derzhavnoho upravlinnia u sferi natsionalnoi bezpeky Ukrainy: Monohrafiia. Kyiv: TsP «Komprint».
Novikova, O. V. (2008). Problema rozvytku tvorchoho myslennia v systemi Edvarda de Bono (Dysertatsiia kandidata psykholohichnykh nauk). Instytut psykholohii im. H. S. Kostiuka APN Ukrainy.
Parii, L. V., & Kubrak, A. O. (2023). Pryiniattia upravlinskykh rishen na pidpryiemstvi. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia «Mizhnarodni ekonomichni vidnosyny ta svitove hospodarstvo», (47), 75–79. https://doi.org/10.32782/2413-9971/2023-47-13
Singhaivska, I. V., & Fedorets, S. B. (2017). Psykholohichnyi analiz poniattia menedzhmentu ta styliv upravlinnia. Pravnychyi visnyk Universytetu «KROK», (29), 197–205. https://lbku.krok.edu.ua/index.php/krok-university-law-journal/article/view/41/35
Smyrnova, A. I. (2013). Rol informatsii v protsesi pryiniattia upravlinskykh rishen. Upravlinnia rozvytkom, (22), 157–158. http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Uproz_2013_22_66
Tatenko, V. O. (2023). Kolektyvna intuitsiia u prohnozuvanni sotsialnykh yavyshch: Monohrafiia. Kropyvnytskyi: ImeksLTD.
Thaler, R., & Johnson, E. (1991). Gambling with the Hose Money and Trying to Break Even: The Effects of Prior Outcomes on Risky Choice. In Quasi-Rational Economics (pp. 48–73). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Tkachova, T. S. (2020). Metodolohichni pidkhody do pryiniattia upravlinskykh rishen na promyslovomu pidpryiemstvi. Visnyk SumDU. Seriia «Ekonomika», (1), 199–206. https://doi.org/10.21272/1817-9215.2020.1-23
Vasylenko, V. M., & Vakaluk, T. A. (2024). Shtuchnyi intelekt v upravlinni proiektamy: analiz suchasnykh doslidzhen ta perspektyv rozvytku. Vcheni zapysky TNU imeni V. I. Vernadskoho. Seriia «Tekhnichni nauky», 35(4), 60–67. https://doi.org/10.32782/2663-5941/2024.4/10
Yakobchuk, R. S., & Samilo, A. V. (2017). Teoretychni aspekty rozrobky ta pryiniattia upravlinskykh rishen v umovakh nadzvychainykh sytuatsii. Derzhavne upravlinnia: udoskonalennia ta rozvytok, (10). http://www.dy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=1134
Yashchenko, O., Makatora, D., & Kubanov, R. (2024). Algorithm for resolving conflicts with clients by managers of architectural and construction companies. Naukovyi visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia «Mizhnarodni ekonomichni vidnosyny ta svitove hospodarstvo», (52), 212–219. https://doi.org/10.32782/2413-9971/2024-52-33

FOR AUTHORS

License Contract

Conditions of Publication

Article Requirements

Regulations on Peer-Reviewing

Publication Contract

Current Issue

Frequently asked questions

INFORMATION

The Plan of Scientific Conferences

OUR PARTNERS

Journal «The Problems of Economy»

The site and its metadata are licensed under CC BY-SA.

Write to webmaster