BUSINESS INFORM JOURNAL.

УКР

ENG

Search:

REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE

KV #19905-9705 PR dated 02.04.2013.

FOUNDERS

RESEARCH CENTER FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROBLEMS of NAS of Ukraine (KHARKIV, UKRAINE)

ROR

EDRPOU 05481984

According to the decision No. 802 of the National Council of Television and Radio Broadcasting of Ukraine dated 14.03.2024, is registered as a subject in the field of print media.
ID R30-03156

PUBLISHER

Liburkina L. M.

CATALOG

Integrative Diagnostics of the Operational Performance of Construction Enterprises within the Coordinates of Multiproject Management and ESG Orientations
Ratnikov D. H., Shyliuk P. P.

Ratnikov, Dmytro H., and Shyliuk, Petro P. (2026) “Integrative Diagnostics of the Operational Performance of Construction Enterprises within the Coordinates of Multiproject Management and ESG Orientations.” Business Inform 9:241–249.
https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2026-9-241-249

Section: Economic and Mathematical Modeling

Article is written in Ukrainian
Downloads/views: 0

Download article (pdf) -

UDC 005.52:658.5:69:502.131.1

Abstract:
Contemporary studies usually assess the operational performance of construction enterprises at the level of individual projects or functional domains, while project interdependencies, resource conflicts, cash-flow synchronization, and ESG constraints remain fragmented. The aim of the article is to provide a theoretical and methodological substantiation and formalization of integrative operational performance diagnostics that combines project and portfolio indicators, multiproject interdependencies, environmental, social and governance orientations, digital data quality, and non-compensable critical constraints. The study applies categorical, comparative, structural-logical and cause-and-effect analysis, multi-criteria assessment, normalization, weighting, geometric aggregation, and scenario modeling. The distinction between operational efficiency and operational performance is clarified. Integrative diagnostics is defined as a continuous process for determining an enterprise’s ability to fulfill project commitments simultaneously, create economic and social value, comply with critical limits, and reconfigure its operating system. A multilevel framework of «enterprise – project – portfolio – stakeholder ecosystem» is substantiated, and an indicator system is developed covering cost, schedule, productivity, quality, resource and financial performance, E, S and G dimensions, multiproject coherence, and data quality. Resource conflict, financial overlap, phase concentration, and dependency density coefficients are formalized. A hybrid index is proposed, combining a geometric integral core with a multiproject penalty and a critical gate, thereby preventing strong economic indicators from compensating for violations of safety, environmental requirements, compliance, liquidity, or resource availability. An illustrative portfolio demonstrates that conventional averaging may produce an excessively positive assessment, whereas the integrative model identifies the source of a boundary state and determines reconfiguration priorities. The scientific novelty lies in combining compensatory, configurational, and non-compensatory logic within a single diagnostic framework. The practical value is associated with supporting decisions on project rephasing, resource allocation, reserve creation, contract revision, and prioritization of ESG interventions.

Keywords: enterprise; operational performance; economic diagnostics; construction development; project management; digital transformation; sustainable development; competitiveness.

Tabl.: 3. Formulae: 9. Bibl.: 15.

Ratnikov Dmytro H. – Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Candidate on Doctor Degree, Department of Construction Management, Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture (31 Povitrianykh Syl Ave., Kyiv, 03680, Ukraine)
Email: [email protected]
Shyliuk Petro P. – Postgraduate Student, Department of Construction Management, Kyiv National University of Construction and Architecture (31 Povitrianykh Syl Ave., Kyiv, 03680, Ukraine)
Email: [email protected]

List of references in article

Diaz Caselles L. M. & Guevara J. (2024). Sustainability performance in on-site construction processes: a systematic literature review. Sustainability, 16(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su16031047
European Commission. (2023). Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2772 of 31 July 2023 supplementing Directive 2013/34/EU as regards sustainability reporting standards. Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg_del/2023/2772/oj
Fedorov V. V., Kostenko D. V. & Ryzhakova H. S. (2022). Systemno-analitychna typolohizatsiia predyktoriv efektyvnosti stratehichnykh rishen u budivelnykh kompaniiakh [System-analytical typologization of predictors of strategic decision efficiency in construction companies]. Shliakhy pidvyshchennia efektyvnosti budivnytstva v umovakh formuvannia rynkovykh vidnosyn, 49 (2), 247–255. https://doi.org/10.32347/2707-501x.2022.49(2).247-255
Ghanbari M., Olaikhan A. A. J. & Skitmore M. (2025). Enhancing project portfolio selection for construction holding firms: a multi-objective optimization framework with risk analysis. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 32(8), 5534–5557. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-05-2023-0532
Global Reporting Initiative. (2021). GRI Universal Standards 2021. Amsterdam: GRI. https://www.globalreporting.org/standards/
IFRS Foundation. (2023). IFRS S2 Climate-related Disclosures. London. https://www.ifrs.org/issued-standards/ifrs-sustainability-standards-navigator/ifrs-s2-climate-related-disclosures/
IFRS Foundation. (2023). IFRS S1 General Requirements for Disclosure of Sustainability-related Financial Information. London. https://www.ifrs.org/issued-standards/ifrs-sustainability-standards-navigator/ifrs-s1-general-requirements/
International Organization for Standardization. (2020). ISO 21502:2020. Project, programme and portfolio management – Guidance on project management. Geneva: ISO. https://www.iso.org/standard/74947.html
Nishaant H., Sudhakumar J. N. & Chellappa V. (2025). Identifying resource allocation challenges in multiproject environments in the construction industry. Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-1273
Ofori G. (2023). Get construction project performance parameters right to attain Sustainable Development Goals. Sustainability, 15(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813360
Onikiienko N. V., Petrukha N. M. & Ryzhakova H. M. (2023). Naukovo-prykladni komponenty polikryterialnoi systemy otsinky innovatsiinoho rozvytku pidpryiemstv: imperatyvy vzaiemodii intehrovanykh struktur [Scientific and applied components of the multi-criteria system for assessing the innovative development of enterprises: imperatives of interaction of integrated structures]. Shliakhy pidvyshchennia efektyvnosti budivnytstva v umovakh formuvannia rynkovykh vidnosyn, 52 (1), 261–273. https://doi.org/10.32347/2707-501x.2023.52(1).261-273
Ryzhakova H., Dubinin D. & Chupryna Yu. (2025). Konverhentno-dyfuznyi inzhynirynh yak determinanta yakisnoi transformatsii developerskykh proiektiv [Convergent-diffuse engineering as a determinant of qualitative transformation of development projects]. Shliakhy pidvyshchennia efektyvnosti budivnytstva, 56 (3), 223–235. https://doi.org/10.32347/2707-501x.2025.56(3).223-235
Trach R., Chupryna I. & Tormosov R. (2026). Decision support framework for post-war infrastructure revitalization using a hybrid fuzzy–simulation–ANN model. Applied Sciences, 16(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/app16094364
Trach R., Chupryna I. & Tormosov R. (2026). An integrated fuzzy logic and network analysis approach to assessing supply chain stability in prefabricated construction. Sustainability, 18(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su18031380
United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 25 September 2015. New York. https://sdgs.un.org/2030agenda