REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE
KV #19905-9705 PR dated 02.04.2013.
FOUNDERS
RESEARCH CENTRE FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROBLEMS of NAS (KHARKIV, UKRAINE)
According to the decision No. 802 of the National Council of Television and Radio Broadcasting of Ukraine dated 14.03.2024, is registered as a subject in the field of print media. ID R30-03156
PUBLISHER
Liburkina L. M.
SITE SECTIONS
Main page
Editorial staff
Editorial policy
Annotated catalogue (2011)
Annotated catalogue (2012)
Annotated catalogue (2013)
Annotated catalogue (2014)
Annotated catalogue (2015)
Annotated catalogue (2016)
Annotated catalogue (2017)
Annotated catalogue (2018)
Annotated catalogue (2019)
Annotated catalogue (2020)
Annotated catalogue (2021)
Annotated catalogue (2022)
Annotated catalogue (2023)
Annotated catalogue (2024)
Thematic sections of the journal
Proceedings of scientific conferences
|
Aligning the Interests of Business and Society: Shared Value, Integrated Value, And Corporate Social Responsibility Nashchekina O. M., Nwafor Franklin Nnemeka, Tymoshenkov I. V.
Nashchekina, Olga M., Nwafor, Franklin Nnemeka., and Tymoshenkov, Ihor V. (2020) “Aligning the Interests of Business and Society: Shared Value, Integrated Value, And Corporate Social Responsibility.” Business Inform 10:349–361. https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2020-10-349-361
Section: Management and Marketing
Article is written in EnglishDownloads/views: 4 | Download article (pdf) - |
UDC 65.011.1:65.012:005:338.22.021.1
Abstract: The evolution of CSR is largely the history of reconciling economic goals of business and social goals of society. Relatively recent CSR related concepts “creating shared value” (CSV) and “integrated value creation” (IVC) aim at aligning interests of business and society by producing economic and social value simultaneously. The purpose of this article is to compare the CSV and IVC concepts and show their relation to CSR. In particular, we discuss whether CSV and IVC can be regarded as substitutes for CSR, varieties of CSR or completely new paradigms, and come to the conclusion that the positioning of both concepts depends on how broadly CSR is defined. We summarize major criticisms of the CSV concept and provide our own vision of the strengths and limitations of both concepts, showing why at least the CSV concept cannot supplant CSR. Comparing CSV and IVC, we focus on the differences between them and show that IVC represents a more fundamental shift in business philosophy and aims at a deeper and system-wide rather than local and fragmentary integration within society. We maintain that the CSV and IVC ideas can and should be used in strategic planning as inspiration for innovative thinking, as guidelines for increasing business competitiveness and societal well-being. We also point out the need for refining methodological frameworks for the practical implementation of the CSV and IVC ideas.
Keywords: corporate social responsibility (CSR), creating shared value, integrated value creation, instrumental approach to CSR, integrative approach to CSR.
Tabl.: 1. Bibl.: 30.
Nashchekina Olga M. – Candidate of Sciences (Physics and Mathematics), Associate Professor, Associate Professor, Department of Management and Taxation, National Technical University «Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute» (2 Kyrpychova Str., Kharkіv, 61002, Ukraine) Email: [email protected] Nwafor Franklin Nnemeka – Postgraduate Student, Department of Management and Taxation, National Technical University «Kharkiv Polytechnic Institute» (2 Kyrpychova Str., Kharkіv, 61002, Ukraine) Email: [email protected] Tymoshenkov Ihor V. – Doctor of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor, Professor, Department of International Business and Economic Theory, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University (4 Svobody Square, Kharkіv, 61022, Ukraine) Email: [email protected]
List of references in article
Porter, M. E., and Kramer, M. R. “Strategy and Society: The Link between Competitive Advantage and Corporate Social Responsibility“. Harvard Business Review, vol. 84, no. 12 (2006): 78-92.
Porter, M. E., and Kramer, M. R. “Creating Shared Value“. Harvard Business Review, vol. 89, no. 1-2 (2011): 62-77.
Visser, W., and Kymal, C. “Integrated Value Creation (IVC): Beyond Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Creating Shared Value (CSV)“. Journal of International Business Ethics. 2015. http://www.waynevisser.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/paper_ivc_wvisser_new.pdf
Visser, W. “Innovation Pathways Towards Creating Integrated Value: A Conceptual Framework“. International Humanistic Management Association, Research Paper Series, no. 17-41 (2017). DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3045898
Visser, W. “Creating Integrated Value: From Systems Thinking to Sustainable Transformation in Business and Society“. Inaugural lecture of the AMS Chair in Sustainable Transformation. 2018. http://www.waynevisser.com/articles
“Shared Value Initiative: Companies Using Shared Value to Drive Impact and Business at Scale“. https://www.sharedvalue.org
Crane, A. et al. “Contesting the Value of “Creating Shared Value”“ California Management Review, vol. 56, no. 2 (2014): 130-153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2014.56.2.130
Aakhus, M., and Bzdak, M. “Revisiting the Role of “Shared Value” in the Business-Society Relationship“. Business and Professional Ethics Journal, vol. 31, no. 2 (2012): 231-246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5840/bpej201231211
Beschorner, T. “Creating Shared Value: the One-Trick Pony Approach“. Business Ethics Journal Review, vol. 17, no. 1 (2013): 106-112. DOI: 10.12747/bejr2013.01.17
Garriga, E., and Mele, D. “Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory“. Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 53, no. 1-2 (2004): 51-71.
“Mark A. Kramer“. Google Scholar. https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=gn4NeQkAAAAJ&hl=en
Porter, M. E., and Kramer, M. R. “The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy“. Harvard Business Review. 2002. http://www.villafane.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/Cap-2-2002-The-competitive-advantage-of-corporate-philantropy-HBR.pdf
Emerson, J. “The Blended Value Proposition: Integrating Social and Financial Returns“. California Management Review, vol. 45, no. 4 (2003): 35-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/41166187
Prahalad, C. K., and Hammond, A. “Serving the World's Poor, Profitably Growing for Broke“. Harvard Business Review. 2002. https://barnabys.blogs.com/files/serving-the-ppor-prahalad.pdf
Nashchekina, O.M., Tymoshenkov, I. V., and Nwafor, F. N. “An Elusive Concept: The Problem of Defining Social Entrepreneurship“. Biznes Inform, no. 11 (2019): 128-139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2019-11-128-139
Carroll, A. B., and Shabana, K. M. “The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice“. International Journal of Management Reviews, vol. 12, no. 1 (2010): 85-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2009.00275.x
Friedman, M. “The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits“. New York Times Magazine. 1970. http://umich.edu/~thecore/doc/Friedman.pdf
Kramer, M. “CSR vs. CSV - What's the difference?“ FSG. 2011. https://www.fsg.org/blog/csr-vs-csv-what's-difference
Wojcik, P. “How Creating Shared Value Differs from Corporate Social Responsibility“. Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe, vol. 24, no. 2 (2016): 32-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7206/jmba.ce.2450-7814.168
Dahlsrud, A. “How Corporate Social Responsibility is Defined: An Analysis of 37 Definitions“. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, vol. 15, no. 1 (2008): 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.132
Hamidu, A. A., Haron, H. M., and Amran, A. “Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review on Definitions, Core Characteristics and Theoretical Perspectives“. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, vol. 6, no. 4 (2015): 83-95. DOI: 10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4p83
Frederick, W. C. “Corporate Social Responsibility: Deep Roots, Flourishing Growth, Promising Future“. In The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility, 522-531. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Kurucz, E. C., Colbert, B. A., and Wheeler, D. “The Business Case for Corporate Social Responsibility“. In The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility, 83-112. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2008.
Lee, M. P. “A Review of the Theories of Corporate Social Responsibility: Its Evolutionary Path and the Road Ahead“. International Journal of Management Reviews, vol. 10, no. 1 (2008): 53-73. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2007.00226.x
Carroll, A. B. “A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Governance“. Academy of Management Review, vol. 4, no. 4 (1979): 497-505. DOI: 10.2307/257850
“Corporate Social Responsibility, Responsible Business Conduct, and Business & Human Rights“. Overview of Progress. European Commission. 2019. https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/34963
Mosca, F., and Civera, C. “The Evolution of CSR: An Integrated Approach“. Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management, no. 1 (2017): 16-35. DOI: 10.4468/2017.1.03mosca.civera
Sethi, S. P. “Dimensions of Corporate Social Performance: An Analytical Framework“. California Management Review, vol. 17, no. 3 (1975): 58-64. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/41162149
Visser, W. “Hack: CSR 2.0: Reinventing Corporate Social Responsibility for the 21st Century“. 2012. https://www.managementexchange.com/hack/csr-20-reinventing-corporate-social-responsibility-21st-century
Visser, W. “Integrated Value vs. Shared Value and CSR 2.0“. AMS Sustainable Transformation Briefing Series. 2018. http://www.waynevisser.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/STL_briefing5_visser_ivsvcsr_2018.pdf
|
FOR AUTHORS
License Contract
Conditions of Publication
Article Requirements
Regulations on Peer-Reviewing
Publication Contract
Current Issue
Frequently asked questions
INFORMATION
The Plan of Scientific Conferences
OUR PARTNERS
Journal «The Problems of Economy»
|