REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE
KV #19905-9705 PR dated 02.04.2013.
FOUNDERS
RESEARCH CENTRE FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROBLEMS of NAS (KHARKIV, UKRAINE)
According to the decision No. 802 of the National Council of Television and Radio Broadcasting of Ukraine dated 14.03.2024, is registered as a subject in the field of print media. ID R30-03156
PUBLISHER
Liburkina L. M.
SITE SECTIONS
Main page
Editorial staff
Editorial policy
Annotated catalogue (2011)
Annotated catalogue (2012)
Annotated catalogue (2013)
Annotated catalogue (2014)
Annotated catalogue (2015)
Annotated catalogue (2016)
Annotated catalogue (2017)
Annotated catalogue (2018)
Annotated catalogue (2019)
Annotated catalogue (2020)
Annotated catalogue (2021)
Annotated catalogue (2022)
Annotated catalogue (2023)
Annotated catalogue (2024)
Thematic sections of the journal
Proceedings of scientific conferences
|
Typology and Characteristics of Authoritarian Political Regimes Panova I. O., Bahinska A. V.
Panova, Iryna O., and Bahinska, Anastasiia V. (2023) “Typology and Characteristics of Authoritarian Political Regimes.” Business Inform 5:6–11. https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2023-5-6-11
Section: Economic Theory
Article is written in UkrainianDownloads/views: 0 | Download article (pdf) - |
UDC 342.392:321.64
Abstract: In recent decades, the evolvement of authoritarian regimes in different countries of the world has become a noticeable trend. This process raises questions about the impact of these regimes on international relations, democratic values, human rights, and the international order as a whole. It is important to note that authoritarian political regimes have a wide range of variations, from totalitarian systems, where power is completely controlled by one person or group, to milder forms, where the authority of power is based on other factors, such as military power or legitimacy. The subject of research in the article are political regimes. The aim is to investigate the typology and characteristics of authoritarian political regimes. The article uses general scientific methods: historical analysis and research to illustrate examples of authoritarian regimes. This allows us to find out the reasons for the emergence and evolution of authoritarianism, as well as to understand its influence on society and politics. The general scientific approach has proved itself useful in systematic researching and analyzing the typology and characteristics of authoritarian political regimes, highlighting a comprehensive understanding of this complex problem. The main characteristics of authoritarian political regimes are revealed; the specifics of functioning of authoritarian regimes and their impact on society are allocated. An analysis of different types of authoritarian political regimes has been carried out, which helped to a better understanding of the diversity of authoritarianism; also features of the latter have been determined. As a result of the study, conclusions are drawn as follows: a estimated typology of authoritarian regimes is important for identifying potential challenges and dangers that they can create for democracy, human rights, and stability in society. This can be helpful for politicians, researchers and actors of international relations in developing some effective strategies for preserving democratic values and countering authoritarianism. The study of authoritarian political regimes points to the need to strengthen international efforts to promote democracy, protect human rights, and promote democratic values. International cooperation and support can play an important role in spreading democratic values along with strengthening resistance against authoritarianism.
Keywords: authoritarianism, authoritarian political regime, political rule, democracy, democratic values.
Bibl.: 21.
Panova Iryna O. – Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor, Department of Tourism Business and Country Studies, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University (4 Svobody Square, Kharkіv, 61022, Ukraine) Email: [email protected] Bahinska Anastasiia V. – Student, V. N. Karazin Kharkiv National University (4 Svobody Square, Kharkіv, 61022, Ukraine) Email: [email protected]
List of references in article
Anselmi, M. “Populism, social polarization and hybrid regimes: the case of Venezuela“. Globalization and Socio-Political New Trends. 2016. https://iberoame.usal.es/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Anselmi_Ponencia-Salamanca.pdf
Banks, A. S., and Wilson, K. A. Cross-national time-series data archive. Israel: Databanks International, 2012.
Brooker, P. Non-Democratic Regimes: Theory, Government and Politics. New York: Palgrave, 2009.
Brownlee, J. Authoritarianism in an Age of Democratization. Cambridge University Press, 2007.
Sultanistic Regimes. London: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1998.
Cheibub, J., Gandhi, J., and Vreeland, J. “Democracy and Dictatorship Revisited“. Public Choice, vol. 143 (2010): 67-101. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-009-9491-2
Frantz, E., and Ezrow, N. The Politics of Dictatorship: Institutions and Outcomes in Authoritarian Regimes. Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 2011.
Geddes, B. Paradigms and Sand Castles - Theory Building and Research Design in Comparative Politics. Michigan: Michigan University Press, 2003.
Geddes, B. “What Do We Know about Democratization after Twenty Years?“ Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 2 (1999): 115-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.115
Geddes, B., Wright, J., and Frantz, E. “Autocratic Breakdown and Regime Transitions: A New Data Set“. Perspectives on Politics, vol. 12, no. 2 (2014): 313-331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592714000851
Wahmann, M., Teorell, J., and Hadenius, A. “Authoritarian Regime Types Revisited: Updated Data in Comparative Perspective“. Contemporary Politics, vol. 19, no. 1 (2013): 19-34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2013.773200
Herb, M. All in the Family: Absolutism, Revolution, and Democracy in the Middle Eastern Monarchies. New York: State University of New York Press, 1999.
Linz, J. J. “An Authoritarian Regime: Spain. Cleavages, Ideologies, and Party Systems“. Transactions of the Westermarck Society, vol. 11 (1964): 291-341.
Levitsky, S., and Way, L. A. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.
Wahman, M., Teorell, J., and Hadenius, A. “Authoritarian Regimes Data Set, version 5.0“. https://xmarquez.github.io/democracyData/reference/wahman_teorell_hadenius.html
Nordlinger, E. A. Soldiers in Politics: Military Coups and Government. Pearson College Div., 1976.
Robinson, N., and Milne, S. “Populism and political development in hybrid regimes: Russia and the development of official populism“. International Political Science Review, vol. 38, no. 4 (2017): 412-425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512117697705
Roller, E. “Comparing the Performance of Autocracies: Issues in Measuring Types of Autocratic Regimes and Performance“. Contemporary Politics, vol. 19, no. 1 (2013): 35-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2013.773201
Schedler, A. Electoral Authoritarianism: The Dynamics of Unfree Competition. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2006.
Carothers, T. Democracies Divided: The Global Challenge of Political Polarization. Washington: Brookings Press, 2019.
Waltz, K. N. Man, the state and war: A theoretical analysis. New York: Columbia University Press, 2018.
|
FOR AUTHORS
License Contract
Conditions of Publication
Article Requirements
Regulations on Peer-Reviewing
Publication Contract
Current Issue
Frequently asked questions
INFORMATION
The Plan of Scientific Conferences
OUR PARTNERS
Journal «The Problems of Economy»
|