УКР ENG

Search:


Email:  
Password:  

 REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE

KV #19905-9705 PR dated 02.04.2013.

 FOUNDERS

RESEARCH CENTRE FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROBLEMS of NAS (KHARKIV, UKRAINE)

According to the decision No. 802 of the National Council of Television and Radio Broadcasting of Ukraine dated 14.03.2024, is registered as a subject in the field of print media.
ID R30-03156

 PUBLISHER

Liburkina L. M.

 SITE SECTIONS

Main page

Editorial staff

Editorial policy

Annotated catalogue (2011)

Annotated catalogue (2012)

Annotated catalogue (2013)

Annotated catalogue (2014)

Annotated catalogue (2015)

Annotated catalogue (2016)

Annotated catalogue (2017)

Annotated catalogue (2018)

Annotated catalogue (2019)

Annotated catalogue (2020)

Annotated catalogue (2021)

Annotated catalogue (2022)

Annotated catalogue (2023)

Annotated catalogue (2024)

Annotated catalogue (2025)

Thematic sections of the journal

Proceedings of scientific conferences


Polarity Management as a Strategic Mechanism for Improving Organizational Development
Yeromenko G. V., Maltseva O. Y., Savruk O. Y., Shcherbyna O. V.

Yeromenko, Galyna V. et al. (2025) “Polarity Management as a Strategic Mechanism for Improving Organizational Development.” Business Inform 10:61–61.
https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2025-10-61-61

Section: Management and Marketing

Article is written in Ukrainian
Downloads/views: 0

UDC 65.012.1:65.012.32:005.95/.96

Abstract:
The article conducts a comprehensive study of managing polarities as an effective tool for organizational development amid the modern challenges of globalization, digital transformation, and high environmental turbulence. It is highlighted that confusion between the categories of «problem,» «paradox,» and «polarity» leads to managerial errors, destructive conflicts, and loss of efficiency in complex organizational systems, particularly in matrix and multi-hub structures. The necessity of distinguishing these concepts and shifting management approaches from linear problem-solving to balancing interdependent yet opposing values is substantiated. Special attention is given to developing «polarity thinking» competencies, which allow managers and teams to recognize the complementarity of polarities and avoid the pitfalls of extremes, such as excessive centralization or chaotic decentralization. The development of this competency reduces internal resistance to change, transforms conflicts from a destructive to a constructive dimension, and lays the groundwork for achieving organizational ambidexterity, allowing organizations to simultaneously sustain operational efficiency and pursue innovative breakthroughs. A conceptual model called the «Polar Contour» has been proposed. It integrates four key elements: polarity maps, which enable visualization of complementary opposites; integration rhythms, which ensure regular re-evaluation of managerial balances; early imbalance indicators, which signal the risk of dysfunctions; and communication roles and rituals, which help transform conflicts into a development resource. The model is designed for practical application in strategic and operational management and can be adapted for different types of organizations. The research results confirm that polarity management enhances organizational development efficiency, reduces the level of destructive conflicts, strengthens corporate culture, and builds resilient yet flexible management models. The practical recommendations presented in the article are applicable for managers and consultants working in the areas of strategic development, innovation management, and organizational transformations.

Keywords: polarity management, organizational development, strategic management, management, operational management, conflict management, matrix structures, organization.

Fig.: 1. Tabl.: 1. Bibl.: 10.

Yeromenko Galyna V. – Candidate of Sciences (Law), Senior Lecturer, Department of Organizational Management, National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy (2 Skovorody Str., Kyiv, 04655, Ukraine)
Email: [email protected]
Maltseva Olena Ya. – Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor, Associate Professor, Department of Organizational Management, National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy (2 Skovorody Str., Kyiv, 04655, Ukraine)
Email: [email protected]
Savruk Oleksandr Yo. – Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor, Associate Professor, Department of Organizational Management, National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy (2 Skovorody Str., Kyiv, 04655, Ukraine)
Email: [email protected]
Shcherbyna Olga V. – Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor, Associate Professor, Department of Organizational Management, National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy (2 Skovorody Str., Kyiv, 04655, Ukraine)
Email: [email protected]

List of references in article

Cameron K. S. (1986). Effectiveness as Paradox: Consensus and Conflict in Conceptions of Organizational Effectiveness. Management Science, 5(32), 539–553. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.32.5.539
Cameron K. S. & Quinn R. E. (2011). Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture: Based on the Competing Values Framework. Jossey-Bass.
Gibson C. B. & Birkinshaw J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, 2(47), 209–226. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159573
He Z. L. & Wong P. K. (2004). Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis. Organization Science, 4(15), 481–494. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0078
Johnson B. (2014). Polarity Management: Identifying and Managing Unsolvable Problems. HRD Press.
Miron-Spektor E., Ingram A., Keller J. & et al. (2018). Microfoundations of Organizational Paradox: The Problem is How We Think about the Problem. Academy of Management Journal, 1(61), 26–45. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0594
Senge P. M. (2006). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. Doubleday.
Smith W. K. & Lewis M. W. (2011). Toward a Theory of Paradox: A Dynamic Equilibrium Model of Organizing. Academy of Management Review, 2(36), 381–403. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0223
Smith W. K., Lewis M. W., Jarzabkowski P. & Langley A. (2017). The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Paradox. Oxford University Press.
OSCE. (2020). Strengthening organizational resilience in complex environments: Tools and approaches. OSCE Publications.

 FOR AUTHORS

License Contract

Conditions of Publication

Article Requirements

Regulations on Peer-Reviewing

Publication Contract

Current Issue

Frequently asked questions

 INFORMATION

The Plan of Scientific Conferences


 OUR PARTNERS


Journal «The Problems of Economy»

  © Business Inform, 1992 - 2025 The site and its metadata are licensed under CC BY-SA. Write to webmaster