BUSINESS INFORM JOURNAL.

УКР

ENG

Search:

REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE

KV #19905-9705 PR dated 02.04.2013.

FOUNDERS

RESEARCH CENTRE FOR INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PROBLEMS of NAS (KHARKIV, UKRAINE)

According to the decision No. 802 of the National Council of Television and Radio Broadcasting of Ukraine dated 14.03.2024, is registered as a subject in the field of print media.
ID R30-03156

PUBLISHER

Liburkina L. M.

SITE SECTIONS

From Result to Efficiency: The Socioeconomic Context of Improvement of Priority Development Territories
Martynovych N. O.

Martynovych, Nataly O. (2022) “From Result to Efficiency: The Socioeconomic Context of Improvement of Priority Development Territories.” Business Inform 4:65–74.
https://doi.org/10.32983/2222-4459-2022-4-65-74

Section: Regional Economy

Article is written in Ukrainian
Downloads/views: 0

Download article (pdf) -

UDC 64.011.44/332.122.6+338.246.88

Abstract:
The position of Ukraine on the world stage is determined by regional development, which increases the saturation and relevance of regional topic in scientific economic research. The acquisition of economic independence by the regions causes the need for reassessment of their position and place in the economic space. One of the instruments for improving the efficiency of regional development is the creation of priority development territories (PDT), which is based on special economic and legal regimes facilitating the intensification of investment activities, the creation of additional jobs, upgrading the standard of living of the population, the profitability of business entities, the completeness of local budgets, etc. The research is directed towards substantiating the theoretical and methodological principles and developing conceptual approaches to the efficiency of PDT development. The theoretical basis constituted the scientific works of domestic and foreign authors. In the process of research, the historical and logical method of general scientific cognition, system approach, analysis, induction, deduction were used. Generalization of different scientific points of view regarding the concepts of «result», «effect», «effectiveness», «efficiency» allowed to conclude that they have significant differences. It was observed that in modern science the issues of delimitation of these categories are debatable. In this regard, the subordination of the result, effect, effectiveness and efficiency is outlined. The author’s vision of the essence of socioeconomic efficiency of the territories of priority development is proposed, which means the state of social and economic conditions, as well as territorial disparities in development before and after the introduction of special economic and legal regimes. The author’s approach allows to expand the scientific vision of the essence and content of efficiency in contemporary realities. The conceptual provisions presented in the article form the basis for further systematization of the indicators of the result and content of effectiveness of improvement of priority development territories, which, in turn, be included in the basis of the methodology for assessing the efficiency of the development of PDT.

Keywords: result, effect, effectiveness, efficiency, improvement of priority development territories.

Fig.: 1. Tabl.: 3. Bibl.: 50.

Martynovych Nataly O. – Candidate of Sciences (Economics), Associate Professor, Senior Research Fellow, Department of Interregional Cooperation, V. Mamutov Institute of Economic and Legal Research of the NAS of Ukraine (office no. 323 2 Marii Kapnist Str., Kyiv, 03057, Ukraine)
Email: [email protected]

List of references in article

Pareto, V. Kompendium po obshchey sotsiologii [Compendium in General Sociology]. Moscow: GU VShE, 2007.
Sink, D. S. Upravleniye proizvoditelnostyu: planirovaniye, izmereniye i otsenka, kontrol i povysheniye [Performance Management: Planning, Measuring and Evaluating, Monitoring and Improving]. Moscow: Progress, 1989.
Drucker, R. Managing in Turbulent Times. New York: Harper Business, 2006.
Tishchenko, A. N., Kizim, N. A., and Dogaydaylo, Ya. V. Ekonomicheskaya rezultativnost deyatelnosti predpriyatiya [Economic Performance of the Enterpris]. Kharkiv: ID «INZhEK», 2005.
Kutsenko, A. V. Orhanizatsiino-ekonomichnyi mekhanizm upravlinnia efektyvnistiu diialnosti pidpryiemstva spozhyvchoi kooperatsii Ukrainy [Organizational and Economic Mechanism for Managing the Efficiency of the Enterprise of Consumer Cooperation of Ukraine]. Poltava: RVV PUSKU, 2008.
Oleksiuk, O. I. “Tekhnolohiia otsinky rezultatyvnosti diialnosti pidpryiemstva“ [Technology for Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Enterprise]. Naukovi pratsi Cherkaskoho derzhavnoho tekhnichnoho universytetu. Seriia «Ekonomichni nauky», vol. 2, no. 22 (2009): 169-173.
Hupalo, A. O. “Vyznachennia zmistu poniat: «efekt», «efektyvnist» ta «rezultatyvnist»“ [Defining the Content of the Concepts: "Effect", "Efficiency" and "Effectiveness"]. Problemy formuvannia novoi ekonomiky XXI stolittia. 2012. http://www.confcontact.com/20121221/3_gupalo.htm
Kosianchuk, T. F., and Halkina, Yu. H. “Rezultatyvnist diialnosti pidpryiemstva ta yii diahnostyka“ [The Effectiveness of the Enterprise and Its Diagnosis]. Visnyk Khmelnytskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. 2009. http://journals.khnu.km.ua/vestnik/pdf/ekon/2009_3_1/pdf/121-124.pdf
Limareva, Yu. A., and Limarev, P. V. “Evolyutsiya kategorii «effektivnost» v ekonomicheskoy nauke“ [The Evolution of the Category "Efficiency" in Economics]. Universum: Ekonomika i yurisprudentsiya. 2014. http://7universum.com/ru/economy/archive/item/1169
Kogan, A. B., and Boldireva, N. P. “Teoreticheskiye aspekty effektivnosti ekonomicheskikh sistem“ [Theoretical Aspects of the Efficiency of Economic Systems]. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, no. 8 (2006): 45-55.
Pererva, P. H., and Kravchuk, A. V. “Efektyvnist yak ekonomichna katehoriia“ [Efficiency as an Economic Category]. Visnyk NTU «KhPI». Seriia «Ekonomichni nauky». 2018. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/161789675.pdf
Vasin, S. M., and Mamonova, O. A. “Priroda i sushchnost ponyatiya effektivnosti sistemy upravleniya predpriyatiyem“ [The Nature and Essence of the Concept of Bisness Management System Effectiveness]. Vektor nauki TGU, no. 4 (2012): 229-232.
Ustymenko, V. A. et al. Terytorii priorytetnoho rozvytku yak instrument vyrishennia sotsialno-ekonomichnykh problem Donetskoi ta Luhanskoi oblastei [Territories of Priority Development as a Tool for Solving Socio-economic Problems of Donetsk and Luhansk Regions]. Kyiv, 2021.
Lyashenko, V. I., and Tolmacheva, A. F. Spetsialnyye rezhimy khozyaystvovaniya na territoriyakh prioritetnogo razvitiya Donbassa: voprosy teorii i praktiki [Special Economic Regimes in the Territories of Priority Development of Donbass: Issues of Theory and Practice]. Donetsk: OOO «Yugo-Vostok, Ltd», 2005.
Zablodska, I. V., Sieriebriak, K. I., and Balakirieva, O. M. “Kontsept teoretychnoho pereosmyslennia sotsialnoi yakosti zhyttia ukraintsiv“ [The Concept of Theoretical Reimplementation Social Quality of Life of Ukrainians]. Chasopys ekonomichnykh reform, no. 1 (2022): 71-85.
Martynovych, N. O. “Terytorii priorytetnoho rozvytku yak instrument aktyvizatsii investytsiinoi diialnosti rehioniv Ukrainy: teoretychnyi aspekt“ [Territories of Priority Development as a Tool for Intensifying Investment Activities of the Regions of Ukraine: Theoretical Aspect]. Innovations and Prospects of World Science. Vancouver, 2022. 275-280.
Yehorova, O. O. “Rezultatyvnist ta efektyvnist terytorii priorytetnoho rozvytku Ukrainy“ [Efficiency and Effectiveness of Priority Development Territories in Ukraine]. Naukovyi visnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriia «Ekonomichni nauky». 2014. http://www.ej.kherson.ua/journal/economic_06/45.pdf
Krupa, O. M. “Vyznachennia shliakhiv podolannia depresyvnoho stanu terytorii Ukrainy“ [Determining Ways to Overcome the Depressed State of Ukraine]. Modeliuvannia rehionalnoi ekonomiky, no. 2 (2014): 180-189.
Klebanova, T. S. et al. “Otsenka i analiz neravnomernosti razvitiya regionov Ukrainy“ [Assessment and Analysis of the Uneven Development of the Regions of Ukraine]. Aktualnyye problemy ekonomiki, no. 8 (2009): 162-168.
Shevtsova, V. I., and Shevtsova, Ya. A. “K otsenke effektivnosti sovremennoy regionalnoy politiki Ukrainy“ [Towards an Evaluation of the Efficiency of the Modern Regional Policy of Ukraine]. In Problemy i perspektivy razvitiya sotrudnichestva mezhdu stranami Yugo-Vostochnoy Yevropy v ramkakh Chernomorskogo ekonomicheskogo sotrudnichestva i GUAM, 762-766. 2011.
Krushynska, A. V. “Obgruntuvannia dotsilnosti stvorennia terytorii priorytetnoho rozvytku turystychnoho typu“ [The Substantiation of the Advisability of Establishment of Priority Development Territories of Tourist Type]. Naukovyi visnyk Khersonskoho derzhavnoho universytetu. Seriia «Ekonomichni nauky». 2014. http://www.ej.kherson.ua/journal/economic_09-1/167.pdf
Aleksych, K. O. “Osoblyvosti funktsionuvannia subiektiv hospodariuvannia v umovakh terytorii priorytetnoho rozvytku“ [Functioning Features of Economic Entities in Terms of Priority Development Territories]. Ekonomika i orhanizatsiia upravlinnia, no. 4 (2016): 277-287.
Chmyr, O. S., Pyla, V. I., and Khilko, V. M. “Analiz rezultativ funktsionuvannia vitchyznianoi systemy SEZ i TPR ta perspektyvy yii podalshoho rozvytku“ [Analysis of the Results of the Functioning of the Domestic System of SEZ and TPD and Prospects for Its Further Development]. Formuvannia rynkovykh vidnosyn v Ukraini, no. 10 (2011): 173-185.
Tkach, S. M. “Spetsialni ekonomichni zony v Ukraini: dosvid i novi priorytety prostorovoi orhanizatsii“ [Special Economic Zones in Ukraine: Experience and New Priorities of Spatial Organization]. Rehionalna ekonomika. 2016. http://re.gov.ua/re201603/re201603_086_TkachSM.pdf
Slovar inostrannykh slov [Dictionary of Foreign Words], vol. 10. Moscow: Stereotip, 1983.
Nadel-Chervinskaya, M. A., and Chervinskiy, P. P. Tolkovyy slovar inostrannykh slov [Explanatory Dictionary of Foreign Words]. Rostov-na-Donu: Feniks, 1995.
Rats, O. M. “Vyznachennia sutnosti poniattia «efektyvnist funktsionuvannia pidpryiemstva»“ [Defining the Essence of the Concept of "Efficiency of the Enterprise"]. Ekonomichnyi prostir, no. 15 (2008): 275-285.
Yachmenyova, V. M., Vysochyna, M. V., and Sulyma, O. I. Efektyvnist upravlinnia diialnistiu promyslovoho pidpryiemstva ta diahnostyka zahroz [Effectiveness of Industrial Enterprise Management and Threat Diagnostics]. Simferopol: VD ARIAL, 2010.
Kutsenko, A. V. “Mekhanizm upravlinnia efektyvnistiu diialnosti systemy yak neobkhidnist dlia dosiahnennia yii tsili“ [The Mechanism of Managing the Effectiveness of the System as a Necessity to Achieve Its Goal]. Ekonomika: problemy teorii ta praktyky, vol. 1, no. 212 (2006): 147-154.
Paderin, I. D. “Nauchnyye y prakticheskiye aspekty povysheniya ekonomicheskoy effektivnosti sovremennogo predpriyatiya“ [Scientific and Practical Aspects of Increasing the Economic Efficiency of a Modern Enterprise]. Visnyk Akademii ekonomichnykh nauk Ukrainy, no. 1 (2003): 89-95.
Andriichuk, V. H. Ekonomika ahrarnykh pidpryiemstv [Economics of Agricultural Enterprises]. Kyiv: KNEU, 2002.
Kutsenko, A. V. “Doslidzhennia ekonomichnykh aspektiv rozvytku spozhyvchoi kooperatsii“ [Research of Economic Aspects of Consumer Cooperation Development]. Visnyk Lvivskoi komertsiinoi akademii. Seriia ekonomichna, no. 21 (2006): 204-209.
Orlov, P. A. Ekonomika predpriyatiya [Enterprise Economics]. Kharkiv: RIO KhGEU, 2000.
Rybin, V. N. Planirovaniye effektivnosti i intensifikatsiya proizvodstva v mashinostroyenii [Planning Efficiency and Intensification of Production in Mechanical Engineering]. Lugansk: Mashinostroyeniye, 1989.
Abalkin, L. I. Konechnyye narodnokhozyaystvennyye rezultaty. Sushchnost, pokazateli, puti povysheniya [Final National Economic Results. Essence, Indicators, Ways to Improve]. Moscow, 1982.
Mochernyi, S. V. et al. Osnovy ekonomichnoi teorii [Foundations of Economic Theory]. Kyiv: Znannia, 2000.
Paderin, I. D., and Goryashchenko, Yu. H. “Strategicheskoye upravleniye na predpriyatiyakh raznykh vidov biznesa“ [Strategic Management at Enterprises of Different Types of Business]. Naukovyi pohliad: ekonomika ta upravlinnia, no. 1 (2017): 96-103.
Shnypko, O. “Nahromadzhennia osnovnoho kapitalu yak faktor konkurentospromozhnosti ekonomiky“ [Accumulation of Fixed Capital as a Factor in the Competitiveness of the Economy]. Ekonomika Ukrainy, no. 7 (2005): 23-35.
Rusak, N. A. Ekonomicheskiy analiz v usloviyakh samofinansirovaniya predpriyatiy [Economic Analysis in Terms of Self-financing Enterprises]. Minsk: Belarus, 1989.
Makarovska, T. P., and Bondar, N. M. Ekonomika pidpryiemstva [Business Economics]. Kyiv: MAUP, 2003.
Belova, M. V. “Sotsialnaya effektivnost investitsiy v materialnoye proizvodstvo“ [Social Efficiency of Investments in Material Production]: dis.... kand. sotsiolog. nauk : 22.00.06, 2005.
Belousov, R. A. Obshchiy i spetsialnyy menedzhment [General and Special Management]. Moscow: Izd-vo RAGS, 2000.
Kratkiy ekonomicheskiy slovar [Brief Economic Dictionary]. Moscow: Politizdat, 1989.
Ekonomichna entsyklopediia [Economic Encyclopedia], vol. 1. Kyiv: Vydavnychyi tsentr «Akademiia», 2000.
Mitsenko, N. H. “Ekonomichne otsiniuvannia sotsialnoi efektyvnosti lokalnykh intehrovanykh system“ [The Economic Estimating of Social Efficiency of Local Integrated Systems]. Mekhanizm rehuliuvannia ekonomiky. 2012. https://mer.fem.sumdu.edu.ua/content/acticles/issue_8/N_G_MitsenkoThe_economic_estimating_of_social_efficiency_of_local_integrated_systems.pdf
Ivanov, V. N., Ivanov, A. V., and Doronin, A. O. Upravlencheskaya paradigma XXI veka [Management Paradigm of the XXI Century]. Moscow: MGIU, 2002.
Hreshchak, M. H., Kolot, V. M., and Nalyvaiko, A. P. Ekonomika pidpryiemstva [Business Economics]. Kyiv: KNEU, 2001.
Oliinyk, A. D. “Metodolohichnyi pidkhid do intehralnoi otsinky efektyvnosti naukovo-vyrobnychykh klasternykh struktur“ [Methodological Approach to the Integrated Assessment of the Effectiveness of Research and Production Cluster Structures]. Ekonomichnyi prostir, no. 18 (2008): 65-73.
Tkachuk, I. H., and Kropelnytska, S. O. “Novi pidkhody u zabezpechenni sotsialnoi efektyvnosti ta konkurentospromozhnosti terytorialnykh hromad (na prykladi klastera narodnykh khudozhnikh promysliv «Suziria»)“ [New Approaches to Ensuring the Social Efficiency and Competitiveness of Local Communities (On the Example of the Cluster of Folk Arts and Crafts "Suziria")]. Sotsialno-ekonomichni problemy suchasnoho periodu Ukrainy. Klastery ta konkurentospromozhnist prykordonnykh rehioniv, no. 3 (2008): 177-191.
Martynovych, N. O., and Leshenko, P. A. “Rozbudova terytorii priorytetnoho rozvytku: metodychnyi kontsept“ [Development of Priority Development Areas: Methodological Concept]. Ekonomika ta suspilstvo, no. 36 (2022). DOI: 10.32782/2524-0072/2022-36-36

FOR AUTHORS

License Contract

Conditions of Publication

Article Requirements

Regulations on Peer-Reviewing

Publication Contract

Current Issue

Frequently asked questions

INFORMATION

The Plan of Scientific Conferences

OUR PARTNERS

Journal «The Problems of Economy»

The site and its metadata are licensed under CC BY-SA.

Write to webmaster